I don't see any problem with the BYPASS statement except that it's needlessly specific. BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM) without the list of types should not only suffice--it does for me--but also hedges against the addition of some new holdsys type that you also want to bypass but overlooked in the inventory.
Coincidentally we're also working an SR for a different link edit problem with a System Automation module. Truth is, as good as SMP/E is, it cannot overcome packaging errors. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW robin...@sce.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 9:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] smp/e question - PTF relinks, but missing CSECTs. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:41 AM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > What was on the APPLY statement? > It is my standard. The BYPASS _might_ be part of the problem, but I really don't see why it would cause _this_ error. SET BOUNDARY (MVST100) . APPLY ASSEM JCLINREPORT GROUPEXTEND BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM(ACTION,DELETE,DOC,DEP,AO,IPL, EC,DYNACT,MULTSYS,EXIT,DOWNLD, RESTART,ENH,MSGSKEL)) SOURCEID ( RECNTS29 ) RETRY(YES) . RECNTS29 is the name that I assigned to the latest RSU that I downloaded just a month or so ago. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
