Are these LPARs in the same Sysplex? Two beneficial effects if they are:
1) You could - with IRD Weight Management - have weights shifted between the LPARs. 2) Sysplex PI for important works comes into play. Cheers, Martin Sent from my iPad > On 28 Aug 2018, at 21:52, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello list, > > Hypothetical scenario is a single machine with 2 LPARs on it, each LPAR is defined as having 50% of the capacity of the entire machine, uncapped across the board. In this scenario, if both LPAR1 and LPAR2 are running flat out, each LPAR will take 50% of the machine. If one of the LPARs is busy and the other isn't doing anything, the busy LPAR will "steal" cycles from the not busy one. That's the easy part. Here's where my thoughts get fuzzy. Is there a way to differentiate between high priority work on one LPAR and low priority work on the other LPAR. Here's what I'd like to do: Say I'm running a bunch of production on one LPAR and a bunch of test work on the other one. I'd like to be able to steal cycles from the test LPAR and give them to the production one. I know WLM handles this within an LPAR, making sure the high priority work gets the cycles it needs, but is there a mechanism where I can do this across multiple LPARs? If there is, can somebody point me to the right place for learning how to configure this to happen automatically? > > I have higher and lower priority work alternating between multiple LPARs and would like the machine to be able to better balance the workloads so that regardless of which LPAR the high priority work is on, it gets the CPU necessary. > > TIA, > > Rex > > > The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
