Then the two WLMs can’t cooperate - and aren’t even aware of each other’s
state. :-(

Manual shifting the weights - via BCPii - might be doable.

Cheers, Martin

Sent from my iPad

> On 28 Aug 2018, at 22:11, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Sorry, no sysplex.
>
> Rex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Martin Packer
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 3:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [External] Re: cross LPAR priority and cycle stealing
>
>
>
> Are these LPARs in the same Sysplex? Two beneficial effects if they are:
>
> 1) You could - with IRD Weight Management - have weights shifted between
> the LPARs.
>
> 2) Sysplex PI for important works comes into play.
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 28 Aug 2018, at 21:52, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Hypothetical scenario is a single machine with 2 LPARs on it, each LPAR
> is defined as having 50% of the capacity of the entire machine, uncapped
> across the board.  In this scenario, if both LPAR1 and LPAR2 are running
> flat out, each LPAR will take 50% of the machine.  If one of the LPARs is
> busy and the other isn't doing anything, the busy LPAR will "steal"
cycles
> from the not busy one.  That's the easy part.  Here's where my thoughts
get
> fuzzy.  Is there a way to differentiate between high priority work on one
> LPAR and low priority work on the other LPAR.  Here's what I'd like to
do:
> Say I'm running a bunch of production on one LPAR and a bunch of test
work
> on the other one.  I'd like to be able to steal cycles from the test LPAR
> and give them to the production one.  I know WLM handles this within an
> LPAR, making sure the high priority work gets the cycles it needs, but is
> there a mechanism where I can do this across multiple LPARs?  If there
is,
> can somebody point me to the right place for learning how to configure
this
> to happen automatically?
>>
>> I have higher and lower priority work alternating between multiple LPARs
> and would like the machine to be able to better balance the workloads so
> that regardless of which LPAR the high priority work is on, it gets the
CPU
> necessary.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this message is confidential, protected
from
> disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message
is
> not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for
> delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified
> that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action
> omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If
> you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately
> by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety,
> whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action
omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety,
whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAINUnless 
> stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to