My easy guesses 1) Prepping to sell off a business unit 2) separation dev/test from prod or some version of a compliance separation
Not so serious guess 3) manager subscribes to PHB (pointy hair boss) Magazine and thinks that 1 less system will make sysplex lighter Out there.. maybe 4) some weird contractual agreement Rob Schramm On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 6:15 PM Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't claim the experience to understand *all* the ramifications, but > Jerry's idea is the first thing that occurred to me. > > sas > > > On 8/29/2018 17:34, Jerry Whitteridge wrote: > > I agree with Skip - the risk in pulling apart a Sysplex is high, where to > > > > stand up a new stand-alone system will ensure the isolation required. I'd > > > > build a new system and move the work as needed to it. > > > > > > > > Jerry Whitteridge > > > > Delivery Manager / Mainframe Architect > > > > GTS - Safeway Account > > > > 602 527 4871 Mobile > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > IBM Services > > > > > ...further snipped mainly because various email processing has turned it > into garbage. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Rob Schramm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
