<snip> Does the PTF/APAR effect ISV's who use routines like above or ? </snip>
What specifically is a "routine like above"? A code snippet that issues MODESET and obtains key 0 storage in subpool 231? What wording would lead you to think that something that is valid to do, such as obtaining key 0 storage in subpool 231, would be affected by any APAR, let alone OA54807? When a PTF introduces an incompatibility to a programming interface, the PTF is expected to describe that incompatibility. If nothing else, your snippet shows that you are authorized (APF-authorized in particular and subsequently in both supervisor state and key 0) and, as Lizette posted, the wording of the APAR text refers to "unauthorized". Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
