Peter, Thanks for pointing that out, I haven’t read the PTF. I have concern for our customers.
Scott On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:09 PM Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> > Does the PTF/APAR effect ISV's who use routines like above or ? > </snip> > > What specifically is a "routine like above"? A code snippet that issues > MODESET and obtains key 0 storage in subpool 231? > > What wording would lead you to think that something that is valid to do, > such as obtaining key 0 storage in subpool 231, would be affected by any > APAR, let alone OA54807? When a PTF introduces an incompatibility to a > programming interface, the PTF is expected to describe that > incompatibility. > > If nothing else, your snippet shows that you are authorized > (APF-authorized in particular and subsequently in both supervisor state > and key 0) and, as Lizette posted, the wording of the APAR text refers to > "unauthorized". > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
