Your second sentence seems to suffer from wordwrap issues, however I think the answeris "Yes - use LXRES REUSABLE=YES".
It would make sense if the sequence number was stored in the same place you store the PC number. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: LXRES best practices Hi Just went thru Peter Relson presentation Presentation ״Session 17096” on extended addressability My question is I guess it’s always better to use a reusable LX With a sequence number That’s way if your server goes down the system can assign it to another process System Service such as Storage can store their LX in the CVT Not that simple for a regular application Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ================================ Rocket Software, Inc. and subsidiaries ■ 77 Fourth Avenue, Waltham MA 02451 ■ Main Office Toll Free Number: +1 855.577.4323 Contact Customer Support: https://my.rocketsoftware.com/RocketCommunity/RCEmailSupport Unsubscribe from Marketing Messages/Manage Your Subscription Preferences - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/manage-your-email-preferences Privacy Policy - http://www.rocketsoftware.com/company/legal/privacy-policy ================================ This communication and any attachments may contain confidential information of Rocket Software, Inc. All unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Rocket Software immediately and destroy all copies of this communication. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
