I am speaking in terms of development cycle. On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:32 PM scott Ford <idfli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> David and Zman, > > Both good points, C is certainly faster than Assembler or maybe PL/S > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 2:17 AM David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/01/2019 4:08 am, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> > despite being used frequently for the purpose, it's really not >> particularly suited for writing operating systems >> >> LOL! That's absurd! C has been ported to just about every architecture >> worth mentioning and is well suited to low-level programming. It's also >> incredibly >> efficient and has a mature and well established tool chain for >> debugging, profiling, code correctness etc. What do you consider a good >> language for >> writing operating systems? >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > -- > Scott Ford > IDMWORKS > z/OS Development > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
