> Um. You might want to check out

You might want to check out the release mentioned in the message. The reference 
I gave was for the release that Stephenson mentioned.

> Relevance?

The relevance is that *you* were the one to bring up S/369.

>
>Bah! Real programmers use octal.

>Relevance?

Sigh! Humor is such a subjective thing (STR)

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2019 9:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: instruction clock speed

Seymour J Metz wrote:

>Phil Smith III demonstrated his ignorance by writing

>> Rexx wasn't available yet, doh

>http://secure-web.cisco.com/1QRAFkUYw2Wlyn1XhYsGe_BRrEEd3-fi0Gn1jATHOqfONIVl6WVN7ONtm2uZ3GCT0S_JgmY2mk1hxx1oCNPOswaB8UqVL3_xqNF7oxUAU25AJ7nSD7PlObRtJCaiTODRDx6c9Og2M2lwVwp9zs9EJG7cWasYBWmCg9esVoHtBWrHfWPoJIeF5lmfltEN4Kko7AxXNQ4-eOswFhVYaTu4lbCKho3YXP_k1INW-Oa5pQIv-pgiUKo8M-K0LUnHKHWmgHKc16tgELjRH8Aj6rmTDuFV4uV6KBHCZkNUyDagba18MxnkvREYkn6KcZiQ97ZTBrQLv95ld6gEAl_CWpUy-_jwC9FaoMWHPnJI82ux_Bq00kp2qL-Ga8BQImh-lhzvnEJDduX8cUcMFRDzZW_1FPdLF9eqIQtBtFrrlcV_UDbjL6l4gsjxrwv2Vg6o2Dkv6/http%3A%2F%2Fbitsavers.org%2Fpdf%2Fibm%2F370%2FVM_SP%2FRelease_3.0_Jul83%2FSC24-5239-0_VM_SP_Interpreter_Reference_Rel_3_Sep83.pdf



Um. You might want to check out 
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1K898OyJNyNuet-xm5Kc5Nt0L9R5e7JRwbf5QqUWqyaqIKlrm4yD18x7SePABEpFbF3NzXHbACPcIXDO8pY0yWTXs3bDKgnP33vGmtGR5Wi1JmEXcjqdcOWS_7NxgzwiygWELIzx_vFY1tel93NrRfhXdSCeaBS3BAv5gURcaGbsR4YJWvY0hYSOtYgzYIOfRrhFLzLgcQDg_1pf-tP3V09-UXonIpUhyY3C0WZxWTCso-DjR-CZU4n-p7K6bbCLUmjDLUFYpwKysxycs1fEBfTZKm-41rTDZE-hRuGaEYLQyM_WH8bHSFCGWlK6wL3-peh65sm6sRUsrEhb8Ytye1UinhcFk1gKmFY1L8Dm1SP_wDaygdCRnV3cQ5KSRhN3q11uCThAjDyxOnq3mUJqdwxZgGDmm0ZeFCkdHqIxELRFddICOYRexpSUrJ5WX_4Gx/https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FEXEC_2,
 and then perhaps review the meanings of "preceded" and "superseded". And 
"comity".



>>  Stephenson went back to S/360

>Yes, but EXEC2 didn't.



Relevance? And it's "EXEC 2", not "EXEC2", if we're being pedantic.



>> when men were men and systems were big.

>Bah! Real programmers use octal.



Relevance?



Seriously, your post makes zero sense.



.phsiii


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to