Nothing to do with your question, but I'd though I'd mention if you at z/OS 2.3 
you can 
use the IRRPRMxx parmlib member instead of the assembled / linked table.  One
less usermod. :-)   There is a utility called DSNT2PRM that you can download 
that
will create the member for you.  It also replaces the range table which I had in
one of my sysplexes.  

The only "bad thing" that I wish IBM would change (are you listening IBM) is 
that there
are no messages at IPL time from RACF that the parmlib member is what was used. 
The only proof is the "IEE252I MEMBER IRRPRMxx FOUND IN <parmlib>" message.
Of course deleting the linked table and IPLing is also proof, but I wanted 
something
more after I migrated to the parmlib member before removing the linked table as
a cleanup step. 

Best Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
mailto:[email protected]
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/



On Thu, 23 May 2019 22:51:13 +0000, Mark Jacobs <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>Never mind. I found out how to verify.
>
> -D XCF,GRP,IRRXCF00
>  IXC332I  18.48.52  DISPLAY XCF 551
>   GROUP IRRXCF00:    SYSD
>
>Mark Jacobs
>
>
>Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
>
>GPG Public Key - 
>https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected]
>
>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>On Thursday, May 23, 2019 6:37 PM, Mark Jacobs 
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Since there's more activity here than in the RACF mailing list, thought I'd 
>> ask here first. I changed the flag byte in the RACF dataset names table to 
>> enable sysplex communications today, and ipled the first system with the 
>> changed table. Even though it's not talking to another system yet via XCF, I 
>> had thought the RVARY LIST command issued on that system would have told me 
>> that it's enabled for sysplex communications. I've verified that this system 
>> is using the updated load module.
>>
>> rvary list
>> ICH15013I RACF DATABASE STATUS:
>> ACTIVE USE NUM VOLUME DATASET
>>
>> YES PRIM 1 SYS001 SYS1.PROD.RACF
>> YES BACK 1 SYS011 SYS1.PROD.RACF.BACKUP
>> ICH15020I RVARY COMMAND HAS FINISHED PROCESSING.
>> READY
>>
>> Here's what I set in the table;
>>
>> ICHRDSNT CSECT
>> DC AL1(1) INDICATES ONE RACF DATA SET
>> DC CL44'SYS1.PROD.RACF' PRIMARY RACF DS NAME
>> DC CL44'SYS1.PROD.RACF.BACKUP' BACKUP RACF DS NAME
>> DC AL1(255) # OF RESIDENT DATA BLOCKS
>>
>> -          DC    B'01234567'                  BIT COUNT
>>            DC    B'10001000'                  SYSPLEX, NON DATASHARING
>>            END
>>
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
>>
>> GPG Public Key - 
>> https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected]
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to