> Does it matter?

Not if you don't care whether the text is in the right column in your previous 
request.

> I accept that as a limitation of the 327x data stream design.  I've exploited 
> it
>at times to insert a character such as ';' at the end of a line when the cursor
>is inconveniently far:

Which is precisely why users would be unhappy if IBM changed that behavior.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Question - browsing variable length records

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:39:09 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote:

>> Why not?  The host should transmit characters counted by the RDW, then NULs 
>> to the end
>> of the field.  Characters typed over those NULs would be returned to the 
>> host on Read
>> Modified; the NULs ignored.
>
>Yes, ignored, not transmitted to the host. There will be no way to know which 
>null the user overtyped with a space.
>
Does it matter?

I accept that as a limitation of the 327x data stream design.  I've exploited it
at times to insert a character such as ';' at the end of a line when the cursor
is inconveniently far:

Tab to next line.
Back-arrow twice.
Type ';'
ENTER.  The ';' scoots to where I want it.

If blanks were treated by Edit as ordinary characters, even as 3270
does, that ';' would appear after the blanks.  If I didn't want that,
I shouldn't have inserted the blanks in the first place.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to