You ignored the context of my statement, and your response doesn't address it. I don't see much added value of a new and complicated way of bypassing the restriction, when there was already a nice simple way. While it may be intended for particular customers, the "feature" is public. And while it's common knowledge big customers tend to get what they want, I'm not clear why RUCSA is what they wanted (vs. the parm).
Regardless, I'm only idly curious, this has no effect on my business. sas On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:48 PM Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:06:59 -0400, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So, I'm not sure why > >IBM is going to all this trouble to ban it, then unban it a little bit. > > > > I think I alluded to it in my OP and IBM also responded that it was for "a > particular set > of customers". It wasn't because IBM thought "hey, this sounds like a > good idea" and > did all the development work to take a step backwards. > > Big customers paying IBM big money have big voices. It may have just been > one big > customer, who knows (other than IBM). > > Regards, > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
