My colleague found out, but he is not in, so I cannot ask hem where. The charge is MSU dependent and for our situation quite acceptable.
Kees. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Dana Mitchell > Sent: 12 September, 2019 16:05 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: APAR OA56180 / RUCSA > > If you absolutely cannot change the application or ISV that insists on > key8 csa, implement RUCSA you can at least control what users have access > to it, although not necessarily preventing one authorized RUCSA user from > accessing another's storage. > > Does anyone know what the charge is going to be for RUCSA? > > Dana > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:35:19 -0400, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >You ignored the context of my statement, and your response doesn't > address > >it. I don't see much added value of a new and complicated way of > bypassing > >the restriction, when there was already a nice simple way. While it may > be > >intended for particular customers, the "feature" is public. And while > it's > >common knowledge big customers tend to get what they want, I'm not clear > >why RUCSA is what they wanted (vs. the parm). > > > >Regardless, I'm only idly curious, this has no effect on my business. > > > >sas > > > >On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:48 PM Mark Zelden <m...@mzelden.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:06:59 -0400, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > So, I'm not sure why > >> >IBM is going to all this trouble to ban it, then unban it a little > bit. > >> > > >> > >> I think I alluded to it in my OP and IBM also responded that it was for > "a > >> particular set > >> of customers". It wasn't because IBM thought "hey, this sounds like a > >> good idea" and > >> did all the development work to take a step backwards. > >> > >> Big customers paying IBM big money have big voices. It may have just > been > >> one big > >> customer, who knows (other than IBM). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
