>From other posts, it seems this was intended to allow customers running programs they either lost, or never had, source code for. In that case, I don't think there is a "nice simple way" to get around the restriction.
In article <CA+AiZz2DXvsrN2XCkDNPUZGKRaPMssczd+D6ud=_3aqhatd...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > You ignored the context of my statement, and your response doesn't address > it. I don't see much added value of a new and complicated way of bypassing > the restriction, when there was already a nice simple way. While it may be > intended for particular customers, the "feature" is public. And while it's > common knowledge big customers tend to get what they want, I'm not clear > why RUCSA is what they wanted (vs. the parm). > Regardless, I'm only idly curious, this has no effect on my business. > sas > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:48 PM Mark Zelden <m...@mzelden.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:06:59 -0400, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > So, I'm not sure why > > >IBM is going to all this trouble to ban it, then unban it a little bit. > > > > > > > I think I alluded to it in my OP and IBM also responded that it was for "a > > particular set > > of customers". It wasn't because IBM thought "hey, this sounds like a > > good idea" and > > did all the development work to take a step backwards. > > > > Big customers paying IBM big money have big voices. It may have just been > > one big > > customer, who knows (other than IBM). > > > > Regards, -- Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive sas...@sas.com (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
