On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 14:30:31 -0600, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>The biggest gain was using the environmental stem for bpxwunix that I
>implemented this morning after some testing. I will check out that
>bpx_shareas shortly as it sounds interesting.
>
Details? What did you put in that environmental stem?
env.0=???
env.1=???
...???
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Salva Carrasco
>Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 2:20 PM
> ...
>Some time ago, I was working in a similar issue: Ispf calling Java. The
>creation of the JVM was really heavy, so we changed java code to accept
>subcommand from stdin, "forked" it and communicate with the Ispf/Rexx code
>using pipes.
>
I assume POSIX pipes rather than CMS/TSO/BATCHPIPES. Can
your forked address space address ISPEXEC/ISREDIT subcommands
through such a pipe? I believe you'd need a daemon lingering in
the parent process to do that.
--gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
