Charles, I will have to try MCSFLAG= HRDCPY ..
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:18 AM Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > iirc (it was decades ago), WTL drops the exact text into the log. None of > the ~80 bytes of timestamp, flags, job ID, etc. is prefixed. So, WTO is > better in that you do get all that. > > If WTL suits the purpose though, I don't see much harm in using it. > However, if you have any log post-processing, you should check to see if > it's going to gag on your non-standard messages. > > sas > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 10:27 AM Jeremy Nicoll < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Nov 2019, at 15:14, Charles Mills wrote: > > > Possibly because AT LEAST since z/OS 1.10 (and I think long before > that) > > IBM > > > has been saying > > > > > > Note: IBM recommends you use the WTO macro with the MCSFLAG=HRDCPY > > parameter > > > instead of WTL, because WTO supplies more data than WTL. > > > > What does that mean? Surely in both cases the data is what the > programmer > > elects to send? > > > > I'd have thought there'd be advantages in not sending log data through > > message processing. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > sas > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
