Billy, you can access DB2 table (or VSAM with a small trick) directly from your REXX ISPF programs. IMHO the table size you've described is better in a "DB-like" object.
Regards. Max Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 15:19 Billy Ashton < [email protected]> ha scritto: > Hello, I am working with an application team, and they are creating an ISPF > application. One of the options is to use an ISPF table for the data in one > component, but they will have between 50,000 and 80,000 rows in the table. > > What are your experiences with large ISPF tables, and is a table of 80,000 > rows acceptable or practical? Another option is to write the ISPF > application in COBOL and use VSAM or a database (although having only a > single table in the database doesn't sound like the best course of action, > either.) Data is loaded on a monthly basis (maybe 500-700 records) and > otherwise this is a read-only ISPF application. > > Thanks for your thoughts. > > Billy. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
