One obvious use is to detect conditions for which there is an active ON unit. It's much easier with (E)SPIE.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of David Crayford <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ESPIE question (does ESPIE "cover" ATTACH'd sub-tasks) In that case why does LE use ESPIE in condition handling? > On 2 Apr 2020, at 9:53 pm, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd say that no one should use ESPIE unless they have a valid performance > reason to do so. > > <snip> > And no clean way to percolate. > <snip> > As of z/OS 1.12 there is: you can set EPIEPERC > > (E)STAI is the only recovery mechanism that comes to mind that applies to > other work unit(s). > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
