Right now I only run z/VM in an IFL LPAR, but may eventually also run it in a CP LPAR.
I can see where it might be nice to be able to base actions on LPAR type rather than on system name in EXECs common to all systems. Doing so woul d reduce the work required when adding new systems (1st level or 2nd level) . Knowing may or may not have some application at Disaster Recovery where w e recover on a CP instead of an IFL. There may also be value to knowing when running a CSE complex. Brian Nielsen On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:19:52 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >On Tuesday, 06/13/2006 at 12:00 AST, "Stracka, James (GTI)" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Works great! Thank you. > >Like Mr. Bitner, I too would be interested to know how folks intend to u se >this information. I'm not denying the need, but want to understand the >importance. The only one I've seen so far is: >- Verify that the LPAR is configured correctly
