VCTCA SNA protocol requires VTAM for POWER PNETTING. Is VTAM more efficient than TCP/IP?
-----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 11:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VCTC vs VSWITCH If you can work with VCTCA, then that is the way to go. Biggest reason, lower overhead. You are communicating over "hardware". With the IP method, you have multiple IP stacks that you have to drive with your 390 processor(s). Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting Law of Cat Sleeping All cats must sleep with people whenever possible, in a position as uncomfortable for the people involved, and as comfortable as possible for the cat >>> "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/7/2007 11:24 AM >>> I have several VSE under z/VM and PNET files around the VSE's. I was just wondering what others think is the best way to do this. Virtual CTC's or TCP/IP using a VSWITCH. Any opinions? Would my TCP/IP PNETTING ever hit a 'real' wire?
