Technically, the IOCP and what you do dynamically do not have to match. I've go bo other clues as my last IOCP changes dates from many years back.
2007/12/24, Shimon Lebowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello all! > I am in a bit of a bind. We just acquired a new > (used) printer, Infoprint 4000/IS1, with ESCON > connection. Until now we used a 3900 with bus/tag > on a CVC channel, with a converter (9043?). > > I need to set up definitions for it, but unfortunately > I have been out on medical leave, and am going *tonight* > to be hospitalized for surgery followed by several > weeks of recuperation. I got home from the hospital > last night for a break, and logged in from home to try > to set things up. (Sorry about the personal stuff, but > it explains my rush...) > > Following the 'lockstep method' I did these operations: > 1) updated my IOCP file, and successfully compiled it. > 2) made dynamic changes with CP commnds > > I wanted to write to the IOCDS at this point, but my > contact at work had left early, so there was still a > write-protect on it. > This morning he turned off the write-protect on A3, > and I continued: > > 3) wrote the new IOCP to IOCDS A3. > 4) *tried* to SET IOCDS_ACTIVE A3. > > Step 4 failed. :-( > HCPZQY6812E SET IOCDS_ACTIVE COMMAND FAILED WITH RETURN CODE > 0088 > > So as I understand this message, the token in the CSS > (which I guess is the result of the dynamic changes I > made yesterday) does not match the token in the IOCDS > (which I just stored). > > What exactly does this mean? > a) that the IOCP really does not match what I did dynamically? > b) the token in the CSS is dated yesterday, but the IOCDS is > from today? > c) some other problem? > > And what can I do now? > > All help will be much appreciated! > Shimon > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
