> -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Boyes > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 3:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: CMS TSM admin client
<snip> > > A downside for the iSCSI approach is that I don't think the packet > processing for VSWITCH traffic gets offloaded to the I/O > processors, so > you'd use up more CPU to drive tape operations. Of course, I've been > lobbying for a specialized network processor engine for a while; this > would be an ideal reason to implement it, IMHO. > How about if IBM allowed a zIIP or zAAP to do this? <snip> -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it.
