But Richard, we are asked not to use markup in mail addressed to the list as some people don't use HTML capable readers. Pleasing both groups seems impossible.
2008/6/26 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I do not have the answer, but I do have a suggestion. When you make drawings > like below, use a fixed font such as Courier or Courier New. It makes them > look so much better - and clearer. > > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+ > | +---+ | +---+ | > | | X | | + Y + | > | +---+ | +---+ | > | | | | | > | +----|----+ | > | | VM | VM | | > +---------+----------+ > | OSA | > +-----+ > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Shimon Lebowitz > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: PRIROUTER question > > Hi, > I am not sure about something and would like confirmation. > Assuming this setup: > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+ > | +---+ | +---+ | > | | X | | + Y + | > | +---+ | +---+ | > | | | | | > | +----|----+ | > | | VM | VM | | > +---------+----------+ > | OSA | > +-----+ > VM TCPIP in LPAR A: 10.0.0.7 > VM TCPIP in LPAR B: 10.0.0.12 > Virtual machine X in LPAR A: 10.1.4.2 > Virtual machine Y in LPAR B: 10.1.3.2 > Our network routes requests for 10.1.4.2 to 10.0.0.7, > which is connected to X via a virtual CTC. > Machine X has 10.0.0.7 as its default gateway, so all > of its traffic, in and out, is via 10.0.0.7. > Now I was asked to do the same thing with a > virtual machine in LPAR B: > 1) to set the default gateway in machine Y to 10.0.0.12 > 2) to connect VM TCPIP to machine Y with a VCTC > 3) to have the network route traffic for 10.1.3.2 to 10.0.0.12 > so that VM's TCPIP at 10.0.0.12 will send it on to 10.1.3.2. > My problem is that I *think* I understand that the OSA > will not agree to do this, since the VM host on LPAR A > has the OSA defined as PRIROUTER and on LPAR B > it is defined as NONROUTER. > So, my questions here are: > 1) Can the task requested be done, or will NONROUTER prevent > VM in LPAR B from getting the packets for 10.1.3.2? > 2) If #1 is in fact a problem, how can it be solved WITHOUT going > to VSWITCH? Is there such a solution? > Thanks, > Shimon > > -- > ************************************************************************ > Shimon Lebowitz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > VM System Programmer . > Israel Police National HQ. > Jerusalem, Israel phone: +972 2 542-9877 fax: 542-9308 > ************************************************************************ -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
