If you have such a reader, then maybe the whole note needs to be in a
fixed font. Not pretty for those who have Bronze Age readers instead of
ones from the Stone Age, but workable. It is a choice between beauty
(for most) and utility (for all). :-)

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PRIROUTER question
> 
> But Richard, we are asked not to use markup in mail addressed 
> to the list as some people don't use HTML capable readers.  
> Pleasing both groups seems impossible.
> 
> 2008/6/26 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I do not have the answer, but I do have a suggestion. When 
> you make drawings like below, use a fixed font such as 
> Courier or Courier New. It makes them look so much better - 
> and clearer.
> >
> > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+
> > | +---+   | +---+    |
> > | | X |   | + Y +    |
> > | +---+   | +---+    |
> > |    |    |    |     |
> > |    +----|----+     |
> > |    | VM | VM |     |
> > +---------+----------+
> >        | OSA |
> >        +-----+
> >
> > Regards,
> > Richard Schuh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz
> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:19 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: PRIROUTER question
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am not sure about something and would like confirmation.
> > Assuming this setup:
> > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+
> > | +---+   | +---+    |
> > | | X |   | + Y +    |
> > | +---+   | +---+    |
> > |    |    |    |     |
> > |    +----|----+     |
> > |    | VM | VM |     |
> > +---------+----------+
> >        | OSA |
> >        +-----+
> > VM TCPIP in LPAR A: 10.0.0.7
> > VM TCPIP in LPAR B: 10.0.0.12
> > Virtual machine X in LPAR A: 10.1.4.2
> > Virtual machine Y in LPAR B: 10.1.3.2
> > Our network routes requests for 10.1.4.2 to 10.0.0.7, which is 
> > connected to X via a virtual CTC.
> > Machine X has 10.0.0.7 as its default gateway, so all of 
> its traffic, 
> > in and out, is via 10.0.0.7.
> > Now I was asked to do the same thing with a virtual machine 
> in LPAR B:
> > 1) to set the default gateway in machine Y to 10.0.0.12
> > 2) to connect VM TCPIP to machine Y with a VCTC
> > 3) to have the network route traffic for 10.1.3.2 to 10.0.0.12
> >    so that VM's TCPIP at 10.0.0.12 will send it on to 10.1.3.2.
> > My problem is that I *think* I understand that the OSA will 
> not agree 
> > to do this, since the VM host on LPAR A has the OSA defined as 
> > PRIROUTER and on LPAR B it is defined as NONROUTER.
> > So, my questions here are:
> > 1) Can the task requested be done, or will NONROUTER prevent
> >     VM in LPAR B from getting the packets for 10.1.3.2?
> > 2) If #1 is in fact a problem, how can it be solved WITHOUT going
> >     to VSWITCH?  Is there such a solution?
> > Thanks,
> > Shimon
> >
> > --
> > 
> **************************************************************
> **********
> > Shimon Lebowitz                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > VM System Programmer           .
> > Israel Police National HQ.
> > Jerusalem, Israel              phone: +972 2 542-9877  fax: 542-9308
> > 
> **********************************************************************
> > **
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kris Buelens,
> IBM Belgium, VM customer support
> 

Reply via email to