In the past I have written something like: "Please use a fixed font to display the following text". That is a function of the mail program the reader is using, not the sender. I send plain text. Shimon
---- Original message ---- >Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:00:08 -0700 >From: "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: PRIROUTER question >To: [email protected] > >If you have such a reader, then maybe the whole note needs to be in a >fixed font. Not pretty for those who have Bronze Age readers instead of >ones from the Stone Age, but workable. It is a choice between beauty >(for most) and utility (for all). :-) > >Regards, >Richard Schuh > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens >> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:51 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: PRIROUTER question >> >> But Richard, we are asked not to use markup in mail addressed >> to the list as some people don't use HTML capable readers. >> Pleasing both groups seems impossible. >> >> 2008/6/26 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > I do not have the answer, but I do have a suggestion. When >> you make drawings like below, use a fixed font such as >> Courier or Courier New. It makes them look so much better - >> and clearer. >> > >> > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+ >> > | +---+ | +---+ | >> > | | X | | + Y + | >> > | +---+ | +---+ | >> > | | | | | >> > | +----|----+ | >> > | | VM | VM | | >> > +---------+----------+ >> > | OSA | >> > +-----+ >> > >> > Regards, >> > Richard Schuh >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > On Behalf Of Shimon Lebowitz >> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:19 AM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: PRIROUTER question >> > >> > Hi, >> > I am not sure about something and would like confirmation. >> > Assuming this setup: >> > +-LPAR A--+-LPAR B---+ >> > | +---+ | +---+ | >> > | | X | | + Y + | >> > | +---+ | +---+ | >> > | | | | | >> > | +----|----+ | >> > | | VM | VM | | >> > +---------+----------+ >> > | OSA | >> > +-----+ >> > VM TCPIP in LPAR A: 10.0.0.7 >> > VM TCPIP in LPAR B: 10.0.0.12 >> > Virtual machine X in LPAR A: 10.1.4.2 >> > Virtual machine Y in LPAR B: 10.1.3.2 >> > Our network routes requests for 10.1.4.2 to 10.0.0.7, which is >> > connected to X via a virtual CTC. >> > Machine X has 10.0.0.7 as its default gateway, so all of >> its traffic, >> > in and out, is via 10.0.0.7. >> > Now I was asked to do the same thing with a virtual machine >> in LPAR B: >> > 1) to set the default gateway in machine Y to 10.0.0.12 >> > 2) to connect VM TCPIP to machine Y with a VCTC >> > 3) to have the network route traffic for 10.1.3.2 to 10.0.0.12 >> > so that VM's TCPIP at 10.0.0.12 will send it on to 10.1.3.2. >> > My problem is that I *think* I understand that the OSA will >> not agree >> > to do this, since the VM host on LPAR A has the OSA defined as >> > PRIROUTER and on LPAR B it is defined as NONROUTER. >> > So, my questions here are: >> > 1) Can the task requested be done, or will NONROUTER prevent >> > VM in LPAR B from getting the packets for 10.1.3.2? >> > 2) If #1 is in fact a problem, how can it be solved WITHOUT going >> > to VSWITCH? Is there such a solution? >> > Thanks, >> > Shimon >> > >> > -- >> > >> ************************************************************** >> ********** >> > Shimon Lebowitz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > VM System Programmer . >> > Israel Police National HQ. >> > Jerusalem, Israel phone: +972 2 542-9877 fax: 542-9308 >> > >> ********************************************************************** >> > ** >> >> >> >> -- >> Kris Buelens, >> IBM Belgium, VM customer support >>
