On Thursday, 06/18/2009 at 06:50 EDT, Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm confused, but so what else is new? :-) > You wrote in a previous e-mail: > > > The desire to have a DVD-based DR system would be a good requirement > > to levy against IBM Backup and Restore for z/VM. > > But then you state above that the (your) requirement I suggested David > Boyes submit via WAVV is a non-starter....what am I missing here?
David also proposed, I thought, writing a requirement that we publish the procedure, as you suggested. THAT is what I was suggesting is a non-starter. Requirements against backup products would be more productive, I think. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
