On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Alan Altmark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, it would be. But it won't ever be done if people don't submit > requirements or get their names attached to existing ones. :-) Come on Sir. You can't expect the users to come up with all the ideas to enhance z/VM. Would never have gotten REXX by collecting user requirements for EXEC2. We need some creativity in IBM as well. Even if you whisper the ideas already, raising a hand is not very convincing because tomorrow you will reject another cool gadget and state "but you told me you wanted DSE for tapes instead of Live Guest Migration" or whatever. Don't make me Google for "not in the plan" to refresh your memory. And I'm sure you just blow those requirements away since "It's just David again" like you do with my list of "things that Endicott should do" ;-) Rob
