On 10/8/09 5:04 PM, "Rob van der Heij" <[email protected]> wrote:
> And I'm sure you just blow those requirements away since "It's just > David again" like you do with my list of "things that Endicott should > do" ;-) Hey, don't include me there. I have never failed to get *some* response. It's not always the response I wanted, but they do respond. Although I do seem to get the high cackly voice of Chuckie fairly often... -- db
