What makes this a Layer-3 VSWITCH vs a Layer-2?

Thanks,

Billy

On 31 Aug 2010 at 9:04, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

>
>     No problem.
>
>     Originally, I had on z/VSE machine with 3 addresses used for TCP/IP. I 
> wished to move this to a
>     layer-3 VSWITCH for redundancy purposes. (Much of the following was 
> derived from the IBM
>     Redbook "Linux on IBM eserver zSeries and S/390: VSWITCH and VLAN 
> Features of z/VM 4.4")
>
>
> 1)Define the VSWITCH
> a.define vswitch vswitchname rdev ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3
> b.-and- add the same statement to `SYSTEM CONFIG´file
>     (Remember ccuu1 ccuu2 ccuu3 represent a set of 3 address to be used)
> 2)Granting access to the VSWITCH
> a.set vswitch vswitchname grant userid
> b.-and- add Modify VSwitch vswitchnameGRAnt userid to `SYSTEM CONFIG´
> c.- or - add the set vswitch command in the AUTOLOG1 startup
> 3)Defining the simulated NICs
> a.for userid cmd define nic ccuu4 qdio
> b.-and- add to the directory for userid:
>     NICDEF ccuu4 TYPE QDIO DEVICES 3
>     (a above can be skipped, but the userid would have to be logged off then 
> on)
> 4)Attaching the simulated NIC with couple ccuu4 to system vswitchname
>     (This will need to be performed each time the virtual machine is logged 
> on.)
>
>     (Don´t think I missed anything)
>
>
> Frank M.
> Ramaekers Jr.
>
>
>
>
>
>     From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of
>     Billy Bingham
>     Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:51 AM
>     To: [email protected]
>     Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
>
>
>     Frank,
>
>     Would you be willing to share the steps you used to create the VSWITCH?
>
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Billy
>
>     On 30 Aug 2010 at 8:11, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
>
>     >
>     >Thanks, that helps....the difference between an upCOUPLEd and a
>     COUPLEd
>     >VSWITCH:
>     >
>     >UnCOUPLEd:
>     >AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E LAN: * NoneMFS:
>     >8992
>     >
>     >COUPLEd (and not yet initialized):
>     >AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM VSWAILT
>     >
>     >...and initialized:
>     >* cp q v nic aa0
>     >details
>     >AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIO Name: UNASSIGNED Devices:
>     >3
>     >AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0E VSWITCH: SYSTEM
>     >VSWAILT
>     >AR 0015 RX Packets: 49 Discarded: 0 Errors:
>     >0
>     >AR 0015 TX Packets: 42 Discarded: 0 Errors:
>     >0
>     >AR 0015 RX Bytes: 2450 TX Bytes:
>     >2884
>     >AR 0015 Connection Name: Session
>     >Established
>     >AR 0015 Device: 0AA0 Unit: 000 Role: CTL-
>     >READ
>     >AR 0015 Device: 0AA1 Unit: 001 Role: CTL-
>     >WRITE
>     >AR 0015 Device: 0AA2 Unit: 002 Role: DATAvPort: 0065
>     >Index:
>     >0065
>     >
>     >AR 0015 Options:
>     >IPv4
>     >AR 0015 Unicast IP Addresses:
>     >
>     >AR 0015 10.1.20.2MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-
>     >0E
>     >AR 0015 1I40I READY
>     >
>     >
>     >Thanks Alan!
>     >
>     >
>     >Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >-----Original Message-----
>     >From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>     [mailto:[email protected]] On
>     >Behalf Of Alan Altmark
>     >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:33 PM
>     >To: [email protected]
>     >Subject: Re: VSWITCH defined VSE TCP/IP fails
>     >
>     >On Friday, 08/27/2010 at 04:28 EDT, "Frank M. Ramaekers"
>     ><[email protected]> wrote:
>     >> * cp q v nic aa0 details
>     >>
>     >> AR 0015 Adapter 0AA0.P00 Type: QDIOName: UNASSIGNED Devices: 3
>     >> AR 0015 MAC: 02-00-01-00-00-0ELAN: * None
>     >
>     >And there you have it. The adapter is not COUPLED, as indicated by
>     the
>     >"*
>     >None". An uncoupled NIC is the equivalent of an unplugged ethernet
>     >cable.
>     >
>     >Alan Altmark
>     >z/VM Development
>     >IBM Endicott
>     >
>     >_____________________________________________________ This message
>     >contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
>     >for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
>     > recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying,
>     distribution,
>     >or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
>     >have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify
>     us
>     >at [email protected].
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________ This message
> contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely
> for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution,
> or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us
> at [email protected].


Reply via email to