And not to mention Nomad.....

On 12/10/2010 09:57 AM, Bill Munson wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> as Mike said there are a lot of companies I know of that are using "CMS" 
> applications for day to day work and the DATA resides on "VM"
> 
> they are using "FOCUS" for report generation , as well as "MAILBOOK" for 
> e-mail and interoffice file transfers , and some are using VM:Backup and 
> VM:Archive and the Shared File System for numerous versions of Source Code 
> like GDG's on TSO and submitting their compiles and assembles to VM:Batch 
> for processing.  There is still a lot of WORK being done on "VM" and these 
> companies are not running any other "OS" as a guest of these "VM" systems. 
>  They might and do have other "VM"'s for running LINUX or "VSE" . 
> 
> Granted it is a vast minority of what it was 10, 15, and 20 years ago.
> 
> munson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:   Tom Huegel <[email protected]>
> To:     [email protected]
> Date:   12/10/2010 09:16 AM
> Subject:        Re: Vswitch Grant as a CMD in User's Directory?
> Sent by:        The IBM z/VM Operating System <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone run applications in z/VM? Isn't the 'protected data' owned by 
> some other OS (z/OS, z/VSE, zLINUX). It seems that the high level security 
> effort belongs in those OS's. z/VM just needs to keep those systems 
> isolated and NOT be able to circumvent their security procedures.  
> 
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Les Koehler <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Back in the old days, I recall a finance type person saying something 
> like: The Gold Standard is that it should take collusion between two or 
> more people to defraud the company.
> 
> If we apply that to IT, then shouldn't pswds for privileged userids that 
> can access/change financial data be long enough that TWO sysprogs can each 
> be given half a pswd so they both have to be present to make a change?
> 
> Les
> 
> 
> Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Thursday, 12/09/2010 at 12:01 EST, Tom Huegel <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Does it really matter? SOX is just another way congress has come up with 
> to 
> destroy the American economy, and in fact the American way of life.
> 
> When you read the law, you find that SOX is "simply" a way to hold 
> executives responsible for the financial statements issued by their 
> companies.  Assuming no ill intent (no comments, please!), that means 
> trustworthy data.  That flows downhill, as all such things must, until we 
> start talking about access controls and audit mechanisms for financial 
> data.  That is, knowing who has the means and the opportunity to access 
> the data, and knowing who has actually done so.  (I leave it to others to 
> talk about motive.)  Who, what, where, when.
> 
> Unfortunately, IT security industry consultants have mangled this laudable 
> concept into a paranoia-inducing behemoth that has people screaming in 
> terror as it rampages across the country, flogging every sysadmin in its 
> path.  Why?  Because financial status is inferred from many other data 
> sources and no one wants to spend the time it takes to follow all the data 
> flows.  Result: Secure Everything.
> 
> With HIPAA and PCI running alongside, the "Secure Everything" policy looks 
> even more reasonable to CEOs, CIOs, CFOs, and their lawyers.
> 
> Alan Altmark
> 
> z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
> IBM System Lab Services and Training ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
> office: 607.429.3323
> [email protected]
> IBM Endicott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *************************** IMPORTANT
> NOTE*****************************-- The opinions expressed in this
> message and/or any attachments are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., its
> subsidiaries and affiliates ("BBH"). There is no guarantee that
> this message is either private or confidential, and it may have
> been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge.
> Nothing in the message is capable or intended to create any legally
> binding obligations on either party and it is not intended to
> provide legal advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or
> damage from its use, including damage from virus.
> ********************************************************************************

-- 
Dave Jones
V/Soft Software
www.vsoft-software.com
Houston, TX
281.578.7544

Reply via email to