Bloody Mary #2381, a '76 C-27 is a solid fiberglass hull.  Just  the deck 
is cored.
 
Chuck
chicago 
 
 
In a message dated 1/24/2010 5:02:08 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 
 
 
Gentlemen,
You'll are certainly welcome to believe whatever suit you  best. My 
experience is that I have yet to work on a Catalina that does not  have a foam 
core. Perhaps there are some out there? I am not familiar with  them. I have 
only worked on C-22, C-25, C-27, C-30, Capri 22, Capri 25, Capri  26, Capri 30, 
and C-28. Without fail all of these had foam cores, maybe  Catalina just 
put foam cores in the ones they sent to Ga and SC?
Best  Regards
joe rose

--- On Sun, 1/24/10, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:

From: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Subject:  Re: [IC27A] Re: Possible purchase of a C27
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Date:  Sunday, January 24, 2010, 1:07 AM



Solid fiberglass and  tapers from waterline up. Deck is plywood cored. 
Catalina mid 80's is notorios  for blisters due to production issues...water in 
bildge would not cause the  blisters! Also being that those keel bolts will 
rust, its best to keep that  bilge bone dry, it is possible. 
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my  BlackBerry® 

-----Original Message----- 
From: John Harker  <jhar...@sbcglobal. net> 
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:53:56 
To:  <ic...@yahoogroups. com> 
Subject: Re: [IC27A] Re: Possible purchase  of a C27 

Where did you get the idea that the Catalina 27 had a foam  core hull? 
It doesn't. I've seen a cutout and it is about an inch thick  solid 
fiberglass near (but not too near) the keel. Interesting conjecture  
that water in the bilge contributes to blisters though, I think there  
might be some truth to that. 

John Harker C27 'Prana' #6261 Santa  Cruz 

JOE ROSE wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hello Doug, 
> I  need to introduce myself here as well. I just joined the C-27 owners 
>  as well. I have a small boatyard here in western SC where we work on 
>  primarily sail boats. We regularly do jobs ranging from simple bottom 
>  work to complete restorations. I also own a C-25, C-27 and several 
>  other brands as well. At this time our C-27 is our primary boat ans we  
> absolutely love it. 
> 
> I would like to share some  experience from, perhaps a different 
> perspective. 
> First off  when buying a boat there is no such thing as normal 
> blistering.  Almost invariably, boats that keep a dry bilge will have 
> no or very  few blisters and it makes no difference about the brand. 
> Transversely  boats that have a wet bilge will almost invariably have a 
> belly full  of blisters depending on how long it's been since the last 
> bottom  job. Blisters are expensive to fix and it is very difficult to 
> dry  out a Catalina hull. Catalina's have a foam core that absorbs 
> water  like you simply would not believe. I have a Capri 25 in the 
> slings  right now that I opened all the blisters, tented it out and 
> used  dehumidifiers (2) and two fans on for over two months before we 
> got  all the water out. That is around 50 gallons of water, and the 
> bigger  the boat the more area it has to absorb water. I start here as 
> this  is likely your biggest and most time consuming expense. Around 
> here  blisters run between $2.5-10. each depending on how deep they are. 
>  Next, the nuts on the keel look terrible, but more often than not it 
>  something of an illusion. The last one we did, after properly sitting 
>  the boat on it's keel we simple removed the old nuts and reinstalled 
>  new stainless nuts. This is still pretty time consuming project even 
>  with all the proper tools and a crane to lift with. This is likely 
>  going to be a job for a yard unless you have a way to lift the boat so  
> as to get full contact on the bottom of the keel. 
> Next, a  new mainsail even with my 20% discount it is going to be 
> expensive. I  used to send all my sails out to Sail Care in Ford City 
> Pa. They  would come back and look wonderful, but what I finaly figured 
> out is  that, while they look great, they don't sail any better. A 
> blown out  sail is blown out, at that point it will heel the boat more 
> than  driving it. This sail is the most important means of propulsion 
> on  the boat. It amazes me how often people will gladly spend money on 
>  cosmetics and neglect the sails all together. 
> OK, lets look at a more  overall view. I am assuming you will do the 
> bottom on any boat you  buy so we'll leave that out. 
> 3k for the boat 
> 2K for blisters  (avg =200) 
> 1.5K new main 
> 1K new electronics 
> 1K new  halyards, window/hatch reseal kits etc. 
> So now we are at $8500.00 +/-  and we have yet to address anything to 
> do with the engine, cushions,  or the rotten bulkhead. 
> The only problem I have with this math is  that when finished you will 
> have a fine boat that would be worth  around 10K if you sold it and you 
> had to do all the work, so where is  the incentive to do this? If you 
> were to value your time in here at  even $25 per hour the cost of this 
> boat is pretty upside down.  
> Right now there are some really good boats out the for less than they  
> normally bring due to the economy being in the crapper. 
> On  the other hand if you are one of the bonehead people (like 
> myself)  who actually love working on boats and consider it privilegege 
> rather  than a chore, then by all means grab this thing up. Restoring 
> boats  makes no financial sense whatsoever, but it is quite gratifying 
> to  stand back and look at my work. Keep in mind here that doing things 
>  right takes alot more time than we are used to. 
> Best Regards 
>  joe rose 
> 
> --- On Sat, 1/23/10, Don Burnett <donjam...@aol.  com 
> <mailto:DonJamBur% 40aol.com> > wrote: 
> 
>  From: Don Burnett <donjam...@aol. com <mailto:DonJamBur% 40aol.com>  > 
> Subject: Re:[IC27A] Re: Possible purchase of a C27 
> To:  "ic...@yahoogroups. com <mailto:IC27A% 40yahoogroups. com>" 
>  <ic...@yahoogroups. com <mailto:IC27A% 40yahoogroups. com>>  
> Date: Saturday, January 23, 2010, 3:12 PM 
> 
> 
>  
> Doug. The rigging (and engine) are key evals. Rigging keeps the mast  
> up w compression all manner of forces. Most of what you listed is  
> "expected" more or less. Blisters could be an issue depending on  
> scope. You may want to sister in some addl keel bots and the rest of  
> labor you'll need to invest is not insignificant and a pain such as  
> leaking ports or windows. Roller furling us a big plus if not racing  
> and that's $1.5k or so. Running rigging not cheap either. Do it up  
> right. Bottom line - wait for balance of survey and DO negotiate it  
> down. Walk if you need to. Price of survey is worth every penny if  
> done well and it sounds good. Don't forget to ask for moisture  
> readings that a good surveyor will do for deck, rudder etc. I know  
> you want a boat and seller knows it too. Hang tough. You've got a lot  
> of "work" ahead of you. Assess your willingness to invest the time  and 
> think about if you want to be sailing or working on boat. Perhaps  
> there will be another better suited to your pref. I love my c27 and  
> you will too. Just keep it real and maintain some distance and  
> perspective. 
> 
> Don 
> 1981 #4855 
>  
> Sent from my iPhone 
> 
> On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:06,  "Doug" <dj2...@yahoo. com> wrote: 
> 
> > Well we had the  survey yesterday which I was present for and lasted 
> > all day. The  boat was hauled and the bottom was inspected. Still 
> > waiting for  the service guy to evaluate the engine. I don't yet have 
> > the  write up 
> > Findings so far (most I knew about) are; 
> >  1. Very neglected 1-2 yrs, spider webs, mud dauber nests, water in 
>  > bilge, etc 
> > 2. Keel bolts are SS but nut are steel and are  very deteriorated 
> > 3. Mainsail very dirty, stained in fair  condition 
> > 4. !50, 110 hank on sails very good condition (5-6 yrs  old) 
> > 5. Sail cover shredded, non usable 
> > 6. All  ports leaking 
> > 7. Lifelines in good condition 
> > 8.  Electronics non working (wind speed, direction, depth, boat speed) 
>  > 9. Dead Batteries but battery charger good 
> > 10. All  electrical systems work 
> > 11. Bottom looks ok ('normal' amount of  blisters?) Keel straight, 
> > minimal slop in rudder, cutlass  bearing ok 
> > 12. Most lines needs updating. 
> > 13.  rigging-I had to leave so have to wait till I get the survey 
> >  paper. 
> > 14. waste tank ok but the hoses need redoing. 
>  > 15. water tank- ok 
> > 16. Fuel tank ok but needs new filler  hose. There appears to be no 
> > fuel filter in line to engine.  
> > 
> > If the engine evaluation comes back ok, good  compression, etc then I 
> > am still very interested. 
> >  This boat was listed for $9750.00 and I offered 5k contingent upon 
>  > survey. The surveyor siad he would probably value it less maybe 3k.  
> > Do you think I should re-negotiate less? 
> > 
>  > Doug 
> > 
> > --- In ic...@yahoogroups. com, "dj2210"  <dj2...@...> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Hi All,  
> > > I just wanted to introduce myself. I have a deposit on a  1982 C27 
> > standard rig. This Friday we will haul and survey so  maybe will own 
> > it this weekend. She will be sailed in east TN  after I do whatever 
> > needs doing. The first thing will be the  port bulkhead due to rot at 
> > the chain plate. (Finding some  marine ply might be a problem) This 
> > boat looks ok but has not  been sailed for at least a year so needs a 
> > lot of attention. New  running lines, new cushions, sealing the 
> > ports, etc, you get the  idea. It has an A4 that has not been started 
> > for some time. I  will probably have questions as we come across 
> > problem areas but  this site and links has so far given me a wealth 
> > of info.  
> > > Thanks 
> > > Doug 
> > > 
>  > 
> > 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have  been removed] 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed] 
> 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to