Catalina Direct had OEM compatible metal ball bearing sheaves for the 
C27 mast top.  When I replaced my originals, that is what I used.  
Probably they still do.  Were about $70 each instead of $15, but worth 
it.   I replaced the deck ones too, but OEM parts not ball bearings.  
Maybe something I'll look into.  Mostly with the deck organizers the 
problem I have is salt build up causes them to lock, mine need to be 
sprayed out and hand rotated regularly.

John Harker    C27   Prana   #6261    Santa Cruz

Phil Agur wrote:
>  
>
> John is probably correct, if it’s an older boat the sheaves at the top 
> of the mast may need replacing, however some skippers up size lines to 
> make them easier on their hands and they actually make it harder.
>
>  
>
> Braided lines take force to move all those fibers past each other to 
> bend around a sheave. When a line get upsized they have more fiction 
> points (more fibers) and that have to move further to bend. So just 
> going from 5/16” line to 3/8” can make operating the halyard a lot 
> more work.
>
>  
>
> Wing Tip’s main goes up all the way by hand but it wasn’t always so. I 
> replaced the sheaves in the Garhauer deck organizers with Harken ball 
> bearing sheaves. They look stock but perform much better. In fact 
> every single block on Wing Tip with the exception of the ones in the 
> mast are now ball bearing blocks.  
>
>  
>
> *Phil Agur*                    */s/v/** Wing Tip* 
> <http://www.catalina27.org/public_pages/profile270.htm>
> C270 LE #184            MMSI 366901790
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On 
> Behalf Of *John Harker
> *Sent:* Monday, March 22, 2010 9:06 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [IC27A] Way Too Much Tension on the Halyards Under Load 
> - Please Advise
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Could be the sheaves inner hole has elongated. So it spins with no load
> and locks with load. How old are they and do you know if they have ever
> been changed - from my experince and others on this board it is clear
> the original have a finite lifespan.
>
> John Harker C27 Prana 6261 Santa Cruz
>
> Don Brooks wrote:
> >
> >
> > Michael,
> > If you are having difficulty hoisting a person up the mast with a
> > cabin top winch, that's normal. You should be able to hoist the
> > mainsail all the way up by hand with moderate effort. The boom should
> > be perpendicular to the mast, or slightly higher to keep the leach
> > loose. If that is not the case, then you should look for a
> > problem. Is your halyard showing any unusual signs of wear? That
> > could indicate a binding block at the base of the mast or cabin top.
> > Your halyards could be twisted together inside of the mast or binding
> > on the electrical wiring at the mast base.
> > Don, #6293, Niceville, FL
> >
> > --- On *Sun, 3/21/10, Michael /<[email protected] 
> <mailto:mlong9876%40aol.com>>/* wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Michael <[email protected] <mailto:mlong9876%40aol.com>>
> > Subject: [IC27A] Way Too Much Tension on the Halyards Under Load -
> > Please Advise
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:IC27A%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, March 21, 2010, 10:22 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > I was having a lot of difficulty hoisting the main so I lubed the
> > entire track, the cars on the main and checked for obstructions on
> > the way up. I went all the way up to the top to see if there were
> > any obstructions up there like maybe the halyard jumping off of
> > the sheave or maybe even a broken one. Because of the difficulty
> > in hoisting me on the main halyard, I decided to come down and go
> > up on the jib halyard. I had the same problem. Both halyards move
> > up and down effortlessly, without friction, but the moment there
> > is any load, it takes tremendous energy to pull them up. All of
> > the sheaves spin freely and are intact. I lubed everything at the
> > masthead and cannot figure out why they aren't working properly.
> > The halyards are rope and obviously internal and appear to be in
> > good condition.
> >
> > If anyone has experience with this or any ideas on what to do, I
> > would really appreciate them.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

Reply via email to