Wow!  Very informative.  Thanks.

Mark
C27 Solution

--- In [email protected], "Sneddon, Keith - ES/IS" <keith.sned...@...> 
wrote:
>
> Judy B. is right, because the rudder will work very differently under sail 
> than under power with an inboard. The water flowing past the rudder is going 
> to try and get “behind” the rudder with the minimum amount of energy 
> expended to get there. Under sail, the flow is laminar (smooth), and will 
> also stay “attached” and flow cleanly around the rudder, providing 
> sideforce the way a wing on an airplane provides lift. The center of effort 
> is typically at about 25% of the chord length (width of the rudder in the 
> direction of flow) aft of the leading edge. This will be behind the shaft 
> centerline, which is the reaction of the sideforce, so the rudder wants to go 
> straight, relative to the local flow. As the boat heels, the center of effort 
> of the sail is not over the keel, but offset some distance to lee. The sail 
> is pushing forward (thrust), the keel is holding back (drag), so the boat 
> wants to turn to weather. This gets reacted by the forces on the rudder, 
> which manifests itself as weather helm.
> Under power from an inboard, the flow over the rudder is usually at a much 
> higher velocity, and because of that plus the proximity of the prop to the 
> rudder, is very turbulent (small scale phenomena) plus not very organized as 
> per direction (due to swirl, capitation,etc.). The average flow is also 
> running “downhill”, due to the driveshaft angle. If the rudder is turned 
> far enough that it “stalls”, ie. the flow is no longer attached, the 
> rudder doesn’t work like a wing anymore, it works like a door, and tries to 
> blow open. Because of the combination of the stalled flow, the rudder shaft 
> angle, and the driveshaft angle, the rudder’s lowest energy (most open) 
> position is hard over.
> Reverse is just a mess. Hydrodynamically, nothing works right in this 
> direction. Try to back up as infrequently as possible.
> 
> Keith Sneddon
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Judith Blumhorst, DC
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IC27A] a rudder with a mind of it's own
> 
> 
> More descriptive details please..... How does it behave under sail power?  
> How does it handle under power? is the boat an inboard or outboard?
> 
> Take a look at this page:
> http://www.blumhorst.com/catalina27/catalina-27-rudders.htm
> 
> The C27 is a nicely mannered boat when the rig is properly tuned and good 
> sails that are properly trimmed.   I can sail my C27 with two fingers on the 
> tiller just a couple of inches to windward of the centerline, in winds from 
> 10 knots to 35 knots and higher gusts. (That's true before and after I 
> replaced the OEM barn door rudder) if I take the time to set the right sail 
> plan.
> If the the tiller violently gets away from you under fully powered-up but not 
> overpowered sailplan, you either have an inadequately tuned rig or an 
> unbalanced sail plan.  If you're consistently heeling more than 30 degrees, 
> the boat is carrying too much sail area  or the the sails are over-trimmed, 
> and you' can expect to feel the boat try to round up hard.  Less likely but 
> still possible, your boat is not sitting on her lines fore and aft.   Or, 
> possibly  your rudder is grossly asymetrical from one side to the other, a 
> defect that is emphasized when the maximum foil is too far aft, like the OEM 
> rudders.
> 
> Under power, it's a different story.   A little balance area on a rudder is 
> generally a good thing under sail, decreasing tug & load on the tiller, but 
> too much balance can cause problems when powering in forward with an 
> outboard.  Balance is not your friend when the prop is pushing water at the 
> rudder.  The prop wash from the inboard tends to push her off course when I'm 
> trying to go straight ahead under inboard power.
> 
> With the old OEM rudder, my C27 yawed strongly to port, and pulled very, very 
> strongly.   That's because of two factors - the balance area on the rudder 
> and an asymetry of the rudder foil.
> 
> Backing is always a problem if you let the rudder get too far from 
> centerline.  The longer the chord of the foil the longer the lever arm and 
> the harder it is to keep on course.
> 
> Awaiting more info from you....  maybe it's something I've forgotten to 
> mention,
> 
> Judy B
> 1977 C27 TR #3459 inboard
> Sailing San Francisco Bay area
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: RobAdkins <robadk...@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, March 29, 2010 11:57:55 AM
> Subject: [IC27A] a rudder with a mind of it's own
> 
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> upon first sailing my c27 i noticed the tiller can get away from me mighty 
> quickly if i'm not careful. this was not the case with my old columbia which 
> had a keel mounted rudder. i thought a bit, yes it did hurt, and after 
> drawing pictures in my head i've come to the conclusion that a small 
> percentage of the rudder, on my c27, is foreword of the rudder post. this 
> would explain it's violent tendencies to leap from my hand when executing a 
> sharp turn and it's equally violent resistance to coming back to center after 
> said turn is complete. i'm wondering if anyone has any clue as to why this 
> design "feature" exists. it does make the helm more responsive/sensitiv e 
> under sail but while under motor it is a definite hazard. any info would be 
> appreciated. thanks-rob
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
> addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely 
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITT 
> Corporation. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for 
> the presence of viruses. ITT accepts no liability for any damage caused by 
> any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>


Reply via email to