--- In [email protected], "Karen Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> There are some, it the latest Eidfaxi edition there was an articel on > the biggest known Icelandic (named Islandicus ;-)), he measures 160cm stick, > which would be something around 16hands, so regular horse size. > > So, what do you bring up when I complain > about too many Icelandic owners/promoters not being able to live in the > "real world" - a 16H Icelandic. Do you not see that's just one more extreme > off-the-radar screen example to make intelligent horsemen go glassy-eyed > with boredom about the same-old, same-old outrageous breed claims?
I don't think anyone said it wasn't an extreme example, did they? Maybe it was reported because it is odd. It is out of the ordinary if he is anywhere near that tall. I don't see it as a "breed claim". Kim
