<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Thanks for clearing up that bit of mis-information
> Robyn. Kim I hope you
> > will let your friend know that you gave them wrong
> information so they don't
> > go spreading mis-information now!
> 
> I think that's the case for the breeding
> evaluations...however I think
> this might be or could be the case for the sport
> competitions.  Two
> different things.
> 


Can I ask some questions. Why are there two different
rules for shoeing when it comes to competitions and
evaluations?

I will compare shows to shows, in RMH shows the shoes
must be the same, it says all shoes must be factory
made keg shoes and all shoes on all four feet must be
of the same type, brand and metal. Either all four the
same or barefoot. Why do you think they have these
rules? 

Why do we allow differences in shoe weights in shows?
I think that the weighted boots affect gait and those
are allowed in evaluations? Right?

This is not in my imagination. There are some gait
problems, maybe it wouldn't be so extreme if we at
least took away the "fancy" shoeing.


"BUYING A HORSE 

Guðríður Arnardóttir "


"I also tried a mare that was, according to the
advertisement, very beautiful, with a wonderful
pedigree and great willingness, but she was easy to
handle. Well, she only showed piggy’s pace even though
she had 10mm thick shoes on her front legs. She was
supposed to cost 250,000 ISK. I tried a horse that was
easy on the rein and had a light willingness. He
pulled the reins continuously, took very short steps
and did not tölt one step. Price: 250,000 ISK. I
started to believe that people were always trying to
fool me and that the descriptions of these horses
never fitted reality. Usually there were explanations:
"He is not really in form" or "she has such a lot of
pace" or "he has not been ridden much" or "he is
rather tired after the summer." But in the end, I
found Fúla Grána, a great horse. She has great
willingness, is diligent, takes enormously wide steps
in tölt and trot, is reasonably light on the reins,
but has a particularly moody character and is terribly
ugly! "

http://www.tiny.cc/p34LX 


"Tölt III.   
Shoes and Boots.  
By Arnthrudur Heimisd"

"But it is often helpful to use heavier shoes for
maybe a two months period, to help the rider to clean
pacy tölt, instead of endless work with the reins,
seat etc. , and can be easier on the horse.  Using
heavy shoes or boots for long periods of time, or
every time you ride the horse, does though not teach
the horse to gait correctly, it gets used to carrying
the extra weight and the effects of the boots are lost
again.  
  
Using boots is also common in competition, to get the
finishing touch on the horse, with more action and
cleaner tölt (if the horse tends to be pacy).  But
then it is best just to use the boots a few times or
not at all between competition, so as not to get the
horse sore or loose the effect of the boots.  
  
If the hoof is allowed to be long, it helps to clean
pacy tolt and give more action, but it also raises the
risk of cracking the hoofs and breaking the heels.  
  
If a trotty horse is shod, it is best to use light
shoes on the front hooves, even no shoes if you can. 
Keep the front hooves short.  Using heavy shoes on the
hind feet for maybe two months can help, but often
makes little difference."  

http://www.gaitedhorses.net/Lukka/ToltIII.htm

"PERFECTING THE TOLT
By Hrodmar Bjarnason"

"THE METHODS USED TO AFFECT THE BEAT


  By increasing the length of the hoof in all
directions, the hoof will be heavier. When the rider
uses this method, it is important that all basic rules
in shoeing are kept. That means a correctly made toe
axis. Another effect from a bigger hoof is that a
longer toe axis delays the movement further, which
helps horses to find the right balance in tolt. Also a
bigger (wider) hoof makes it easier for the horse to
move and he starts to be more relaxed in his back.


    A well-known method is to put heavier shoes on his
front legs, and let the shoe be as a natural extension
of the hoof.Horse's movements are affected differently
by increasing the weight."



I do have a problem with this. They make it sound like
this is normal and it is normal within certain
circles. Shouldn't normal be having a horse who can
gait naturally? Why would this be allowed at all? Why
shouldn't all the standards go toward showing natural
gait? There might not be so many articles on
correcting gait in Icelandics then. I think it is
ridiculous.

Kim

Reply via email to