> In the clicker book the author talks about PNH and isn't against it. > On the Parelli list I questioned mixing methods and the response I've > received so far is that clicker training is more conditioned response > opposed to PNH where you develop the relationship--want vs make.
Interesting. I would say that, in general, PNH is more of a "make" and CT is more on the "want" side. I know that PNH would like to change their image to be more like CT, but saying so, doesn't make it so. To me, PNH (not upping the phases, trying to be more clear to the horse, and rewarding every little try) combined with CT, and using TTeam, is probably one of the best ways for horse owners to go about training their own horse. Judy http://icehorses.net http://clickryder.com
