>>>> In the clicker book the author talks about PNH and isn't against it. On the Parelli list I questioned mixing methods and the response I've received so far is that clicker training is more conditioned response opposed to PNH where you develop the relationship--want vs make. ... As a newbie to all of these methods--I'd like to hear more comments if any one has any.
I'm sure you're used to me being JUST a tad cynical, but here's my take. The Parelli's are on the verge of "owning" the NH movement, and at the risk of sounding Seinfeld-ish, not that that's a bad thing exactly. However, it does put them in the marketing/income position of not "needing" other "competitive" methods so much, and that COULD be a bad thing. Clicker training is a smaller movement, so I think it's important that they don't exclude a large portion of the equestrian world. I think we should always step back and consider what factors may come into play when listening to ANY trainer. Even when a person's intentions are pure as the driven snow, people WILL bring their own experiences, prejudices and motivations into every aspect of their life. We're only human. Now, aside from potential marketing/loyalty/ego reasons that may or may not come into play, how do you feel, knowing your horses...? Karen Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
