On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Michael Friedrich wrote:

> i would at least be interested in the method acquiring this, as well as
> some code snippets/patches ofc. does it break compatibility or is it
> just a feature enhancement?

    It's a hack that makes use of an invalid return status (-1) in an
NSCA packet to attach a comment to either a host or a comment.  I very
deliberately opted to go "downwards" a sit looks like the normal
expansion direction is "up".  For regular NSCA packets it works just
like the "stock" version.

    I think the entire modification is perhaps six lines of code.

    Cheers!

+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin)            | West Boylston       |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast            | Massachusetts, USA  |
| mailto:crfri...@rcn.com                        +---------------------+
| http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum           | ICBM: 42:22N 71:47W |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users

Reply via email to