Hi Michael On 11/12/2012 01:45 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote: > > If you are looking for some install hints, use my wiki guide - i wrote > that recently when testing some stuff for my tfnoc vm, also icinga web > integration [0].
thanks, I'll check it out! >> As you can probably see in the other branch of this thread, I believe it >> should be possible to encode this situation using multiple parents, but >> that doesn't cover the entire business logic, of course... > > It's reasonable that you cannot achieve this simply out-of-the-box as > the icinga core did not change that much from what nagios did and does. I know, but perhaps you can confirm or deny that the logic of checking multiple parents will work they way Assaf suggested (unreachability will only be triggered when both parents are down)? (NB, it seems quite logical and it is also not as complex as defining business logic for services) > So you can see a lot of tools and workarounds of the problem within the > Icinga 1.x space, and people will recommend them to you - since there > isn't such integrated logic like "business rules" or "parent child > relations with service dependencies" to make such scenarios a bit more > pleasant to implement. There's always something to wish for ;-) I'll keep an eye out for development on icinga 2, but for now I just want to create a simple and workable setup. Cheers Simon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
