On 12.11.2012 15:19, Simon Oosthoek wrote: > Hi Michael > > On 11/12/2012 01:45 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote: >> If you are looking for some install hints, use my wiki guide - i wrote >> that recently when testing some stuff for my tfnoc vm, also icinga web >> integration [0]. > thanks, I'll check it out! > >>> As you can probably see in the other branch of this thread, I believe it >>> should be possible to encode this situation using multiple parents, but >>> that doesn't cover the entire business logic, of course... >> It's reasonable that you cannot achieve this simply out-of-the-box as >> the icinga core did not change that much from what nagios did and does. > I know, but perhaps you can confirm or deny that the logic of checking > multiple parents will work they way Assaf suggested (unreachability will > only be triggered when both parents are down)?
Hehe. Tbh i don't want to, and i do not have the time to play around with some demo configs ;-) I'd rather trust his expertise being an "old" nagios user in that case. Though, I am more into plugins and addons removing some inner core logic stuff which could behave different. Probably just a dev's taste who cannot rewrite the inner core. > > (NB, it seems quite logical and it is also not as complex as defining > business logic for services) Imho the Business Process Addon might be overkill for your use case. So my way of doing it would be - try Assafs proposal - play with check_cluster or check_multi - add bpaddon and rules stopping when i found a suitable solution. > >> So you can see a lot of tools and workarounds of the problem within the >> Icinga 1.x space, and people will recommend them to you - since there >> isn't such integrated logic like "business rules" or "parent child >> relations with service dependencies" to make such scenarios a bit more >> pleasant to implement. > There's always something to wish for ;-) > > I'll keep an eye out for development on icinga 2, but for now I just > want to create a simple and workable setup. That of course. It's just a matter of getting it done now, but hoping for the future providing better solutions. Plus, setups like yours are interesting for special test cases for the final release :-) Kind regards, Michael > > Cheers > > Simon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users -- DI (FH) Michael Friedrich mail: michael.friedr...@gmail.com twitter: https://twitter.com/dnsmichi jabber: dnsmi...@jabber.ccc.de irc: irc.freenode.net/icinga dnsmichi icinga open source monitoring position: lead core developer url: https://www.icinga.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
