Penasaran dr versi Google nya Gmn penjelasannya Sent from Droid DNA On Aug 16, 2013 3:05 PM, "Dionisius Hendro Putra Palandi" < [email protected]> wrote:
> Mungkin Google balas dendam karena beberapa produsen HH Android harus > bayar Royalti ke Microsoft :)))) lol > > sol > > On Friday, August 16, 2013 12:05:14 PM UTC+7, imam wiratmadja wrote: >> >> http://blogs.technet.com/b/**microsoft_on_the_issues/** >> archive/2013/08/15/the-limits-**of-google-s-openness.aspx<http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2013/08/15/the-limits-of-google-s-openness.aspx> >> >> >> The limits of Google’s openness >> Rate This >> 15 Aug 2013 12:26 PM >> >> - >> 0<http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2013/08/15/the-limits-of-google-s-openness.aspx#comments> >> >> Posted by David Howard >> Corporate Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Litigation & >> Antitrust, Microsoft >> >> You may be wondering what happened to the YouTube app for Windows Phone. >> Last May, after we launched a much improved app on our platform, Google >> objected on a number of grounds. We took our app down and agreed to work >> with Google to solve their issues. This week, after we addressed each of >> Google’s points, we re-launched the app, only to have Google technically >> block it. >> >> We know that this has been frustrating, to say the least, for our >> customers. We have always had one goal: to provide our users a YouTube >> experience on Windows Phone that’s on par with the YouTube experience >> available to Android and iPhone users. Google’s objections to our app are >> not only inconsistent with Google’s own commitment of openness, but also >> involve requirements for a Windows Phone app that it doesn’t impose on its >> own platform or Apple’s (both of which use Google as the default search >> engine, of course). >> >> When we first built a YouTube app for Windows Phone, we did so with the >> understanding that Google claimed >> to<http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/meaning-of-open.html>grow its >> business based on open access to its platforms and content, a >> point it >> reiterated<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwxyRPFduTN2emMxQ0tkTEZzajQ/edit?pli=1>last >> year. As antitrust enforcers have launched investigations against >> Google – some of which are still ongoing – the company has reiterated its >> commitment to openness and its ability to stick to its openness commitments >> voluntarily. >> >> With this backdrop, we temporarily took down our full-featured app when >> Google objected to it last May, and have worked hard to accommodate >> Google’s requests. We enabled Google’s advertisements, disabled video >> downloads and eliminated the ability for users to view reserved videos. We >> did this all at no cost to Google, which one would think would want a >> YouTube app on Windows Phone that would only serve to bring Google new >> users and additional revenue. >> >> There was one sticking point in the collaboration. Google asked us to >> transition our app to a new coding language – HTML5. This was an odd >> request since neither YouTube’s iPhone app nor its Android app are built on >> HTML5. Nevertheless, we dedicated significant engineering resources to >> examine the possibility. At the end of the day, experts from both companies >> recognized that building a YouTube app based on HTML5 would be technically >> difficult and time consuming, which is why we assume YouTube has not yet >> made the conversion for its iPhone and Android apps. >> >> For this reason, we made a decision this week to publish our non-HTML5 >> app while committing to work with Google long-term on an app based on >> HTML5. We believe this approach delivers our customers a short term >> experience on par with the other platforms while putting us in the same >> position as Android and iOS in enabling an eventual transition to new >> technology. Google, however, has decided to block our mutual customers from >> accessing our new app. >> >> It seems to us that Google’s reasons for blocking our app are >> manufactured so that we can’t give our users the same experience Android >> and iPhone users are getting. The roadblocks Google has set up are >> impossible to overcome, and they know it. >> >> Google claims that one problem with our new app is that it doesn’t always >> serve ads based on conditions imposed by content creators. Our app serves >> Google’s advertisements using all the metadata available to us. We’ve asked >> Google to provide whatever information iPhone and Android get so that we >> can mirror the way ads are served on these platforms more precisely. So far >> at least, Google has refused to give this information to us. We are quite >> confident that we can solve this issue if Google cooperates, but fixing >> Google’s concern here is entirely within Google’s control. If Google stops >> blocking our app, we are happy to work with them on this, entirely at >> Microsoft’s expense. >> >> Google also says that we are not complying with its “terms and >> conditions.” What Google really means is that our app is not based on >> HTML5. The problem with this argument, of course, is that Google is not >> complying with this condition for Android and iPhone. Again, we’re happy to >> collaborate with Google on an HTML5 app, but we shouldn’t be required to do >> something that apparently neither iPhone nor Android has successfully >> figured out how to do. >> >> Google raises concerns about our branding too. The funny thing about this >> point is that we’ve been using the same branding continuously since 2010 >> for an inferior YouTube app. Now that we have an app that gives users a >> fuller YouTube experience, Google objects to the branding (even though >> we’ve taken additional steps to clarify that we are the author of the app). >> Go figure. >> >> Finally, Google cites a degraded experience. Since 2010, Google permitted >> a Windows Phone app that was far below the iPhone and Android app >> experiences. Reviews of our new app are unanimous that the experience is >> much improved, and we’re committed to making adjustments to improve it >> further. If Google were truly concerned about a degraded experience, it >> would allow our users access to the new YouTube app they love. >> >> We think it’s clear that Google just doesn’t want Windows Phone users to >> have the same experience as Android and Apple users, and that their >> objections are nothing other than excuses. Nonetheless, we are committed to >> giving our users the experience they deserve, and are happy to work with >> Google to solve any legitimate concerns they may have. In the meantime, we >> once again request that Google stop blocking our YouTube app. >> >> -- > ========== > > INDOSAT SUPER 3G plus > http://www.indosat.com/Personal/Internet/INDOSAT_SUPER_3G_plus > --------------------- > ID-Android on YouTube > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u81L8Qpy5A > -------------------- > Web Hosting, Zimbra Mail Server, VPS gratis Raspberry Pi : > http://www.hostune.com > -------------------- > Aturan Umum ID-Android: http://goo.gl/MpVq8 > Join Forum ID-ANDROID: http://forum.android.or.id > ========== > --- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "[id-android] > Indonesian Android Community " dari Grup Google. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke id-android+berhenti [email protected] . > -- ========== INDOSAT SUPER 3G plus http://www.indosat.com/Personal/Internet/INDOSAT_SUPER_3G_plus --------------------- ID-Android on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u81L8Qpy5A -------------------- Web Hosting, Zimbra Mail Server, VPS gratis Raspberry Pi : http://www.hostune.com -------------------- Aturan Umum ID-Android: http://goo.gl/MpVq8 Join Forum ID-ANDROID: http://forum.android.or.id ========== --- Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian Android Community " dari Grup Google. Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim email ke id-android+berhenti [email protected] .
