Leonard Ong wrote:
>
> > > 5) FreeBSD - kernel lebih lama dari linux, support lebih
> > sedikit hardware,
>
> > No SysV flavour, no good :)
> > Slower system call, fast networking though...
>
> reliable for ISPs or companies though
Look mate, if I were to run FreeBSD I have to give
up my 2nd CPU. To support large enterprises
it must be scalable, including the CPU.
(how good is SMP support in FreeBSD nowadays?)
Stability is relative, can you elaborate more
on your phrase "X more stable than Y",
have you tested it yourself?
(eg. you have FreeBSD box with uptime of 1 year
whilst Linux only 3-6 months)
All our 3 boxes here runs Linux, 2 of
them is SMP, downtime is only due to
kernel upgrade or power failure.
2 reasons comes to mind when people
say "xxxBSD is more ... than Linux":
1. Some people may have new hardware (read:
beta/alpha quality driver), or the vendor
refuses to give specs to Linux developer.
2. There are more Linux users, the chance
of crashing is more often, let alone
the 2.1.x pioneers :)
> > Bukankah latest MSDOS (v8.0) sudah datang dengan buitin
> > graphical operating environment called Windows 98?
>
> Itumah bukan Dos lagi tapi Windows yang include dos :)
Lho emang Windows 98 sudah bisa boot sendiri tanpa
MS DOS 8.0 (io.sys, msdos.sys)?
--
+---| Netscape Communicator 4.x |---| Powered by Linux 2.0.x |---+
|/v\ Agus Budy Wuysang MIS Department |
| | Phone: +62-21-344-1316 ext 317 GSM: +62-816-91-7066 |
+--------| http://www.rad.net.id/users/personal/s/supes |--------+
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT dx s: a- C+++ UL++++$ P- L+++(++++) E--- W++ N+++ o? K? w-- O-
M- V-- PS+ PE Y-- PGP t+@ 5 X+ R- tv- b+ DI? D++(+) G e++ h* r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive: http://www.vlsm.org/linux-archive
Linux CD: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
