Leonard Ong wrote:
> 
> > Stability is relative, can you elaborate more
> > on your phrase "X more stable than Y",
> > have you tested it yourself?
> 
> I don't want to debate *again* with you. I just conveyed What i have read in
> many resources. This is the way i learn.  FreeBSD Faq might help you with
> some points for consideration.

Why not? If you have stated your opinion, you should
stand by it, once another person doesn't agree completely.

> > All our 3 boxes here runs Linux, 2 of
> > them is SMP, downtime is only due to
> > kernel upgrade or power failure.
> 
> Regarding to your previous remark, if you say stability is relative. Then
> your condition would not valid :) to fully justify your opinion. There are
> much involved how much load the machine experienced,etc

Nope, saya menyanggah pendapat anda yang menyatakan FreeBSD secara
umum lebih stabil daripada Linux. Saya tidak menyatakan sebaliknya;
Linux lebih stabil daripada FreeBSD. Jadi yang diperdebatkan
adalah pendapat anda bahwa "X lebih stabil daripada Y"...

> BTW the best way to know what the best for your, is try all of it and choose
> your favorite.  I tried every single major linux distribution till i came
> into conclusion - SuSE.  So to end this argument, why don't we leave the
> best to ourselves ?

Ok, but next time don't put religious stuff into
Linux teritory :)

> > Lho emang Windows 98 sudah bisa boot sendiri tanpa
> > MS DOS 8.0 (io.sys, msdos.sys)?
> 
> To end this argument also here plese take a look : a cut and paste from my
> screen
> 
> Microsoft(R) Windows 98
>    (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.
> 
> C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>ver
> 
> Windows 98 [Version 4.10.1998]
> 
> C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>
> 
> Apakah disana tertulis MS Dos version 8.0 ??? :))) Jadi bukan dos lagi ...
> Seperti C bukan C++ tapi C++ adalah C :) jadi Dos bukan windows tapi windows
> itu dos !!!

Yeah right, what if I create a custom "uname" binary or
write a new "ver" binary, stick it into /bin, and
print something like:

Windows 2000 [Version 7.11.2000]

Untuk lebih jelasnya, coba anda jalankan debug
dalam Win98 DOS box dan ketik:

c:\>debug
- f70:01 fff0 ff<enter>

taruhan pasti freeze deh, perintah ini hanya menghapus
seluruh DOS handler pada absolute memory (bukah hd).

Kalau memang Win98 itu OS betulan (tidak tergantung
dari DOS), mestinya tidak crash.

Windows NT dos box is ok
OS/2 dos box is ok
Linux dosemu is ok
hanya dos boxnya saja yang crash (diclose).

Win95 dos box freezed

> Oh. Sesuai dengan pengalaman dan jam terbang Sdr Agus, mungkin saya kalau
> jauh. Jadi mohon maaf saja jika saya terlalu 'ignorance' :) sehingga
> pendapat kita selalu berbeda.

Ah btw, those Win98 loosers will experience Year 2000 issue
once a year (yes another bug), start counting how many weeks
till the fix comes out...

-- 
+---| Netscape Communicator 4.x |---| Powered by Linux 2.0.x |---+
|/v\ Agus Budy Wuysang                   MIS Department          |
| |  Phone:  +62-21-344-1316 ext 317     GSM: +62-816-91-7066    |
+--------| http://www.rad.net.id/users/personal/s/supes |--------+
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT dx s: a- C+++ UL++++$ P- L+++(++++) E--- W++ N+++ o? K? w-- O-
M- V-- PS+ PE Y-- PGP t+@ 5 X+ R- tv- b+ DI? D++(+) G e++ h* r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Archive: http://www.vlsm.org/linux-archive
Linux CD: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Kirim email ke