> Stability is relative, can you elaborate more
> on your phrase "X more stable than Y",
> have you tested it yourself?
I don't want to debate *again* with you. I just conveyed What i have read in
many resources. This is the way i learn. FreeBSD Faq might help you with
some points for consideration.
> All our 3 boxes here runs Linux, 2 of
> them is SMP, downtime is only due to
> kernel upgrade or power failure.
Regarding to your previous remark, if you say stability is relative. Then
your condition would not valid :) to fully justify your opinion. There are
much involved how much load the machine experienced,etc
BTW the best way to know what the best for your, is try all of it and choose
your favorite. I tried every single major linux distribution till i came
into conclusion - SuSE. So to end this argument, why don't we leave the
best to ourselves ?
( Bagaimanapun Cara yang terbaik untuk mengetahui apa yang terbaik adalah
untuk mencoba semuanya dan pilihlah favorite anda. Saya sendiri mencoba
berbagai distribusi linux major ( redhat, slackware, suse dan debian sampai
saya memilih suse untuk seterusnya ) sama halnya dengan linux atau freebsd
:) ) --> Habis perkara
> Lho emang Windows 98 sudah bisa boot sendiri tanpa
> MS DOS 8.0 (io.sys, msdos.sys)?
To end this argument also here plese take a look : a cut and paste from my
screen
Microsoft(R) Windows 98
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1981-1998.
C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>ver
Windows 98 [Version 4.10.1998]
C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>
Apakah disana tertulis MS Dos version 8.0 ??? :))) Jadi bukan dos lagi ...
Seperti C bukan C++ tapi C++ adalah C :) jadi Dos bukan windows tapi windows
itu dos !!!
Oh. Sesuai dengan pengalaman dan jam terbang Sdr Agus, mungkin saya kalau
jauh. Jadi mohon maaf saja jika saya terlalu 'ignorance' :) sehingga
pendapat kita selalu berbeda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive: http://www.vlsm.org/linux-archive
Linux CD: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
