> Nobody is going to use ACE (or LACE or RACE or *ACE) as > a processing form of the encoded characters, nor will they use ACE > as a generic interchange form for the encoded characters, in any > but the protocols concerned with IDN. probably so. But "the protocols concerned with IDN" encompass most of the protocols used in the Internet today.
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Brian W. Spolarich
- [idn] What's wrong with IDNE? (was Re:... J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with IDNE?... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Paul Hoffman / IMC
