At 19.08 +0900 01-01-06, Martin J. Duerst wrote:
>Sorry, but none of them handles ACE correctly.
But the discussion was not about ACE, but instead that UTF-8 already
works. What myself, Ran and others try to say is that is not the case.
paf
>
>Regards, Martin.
>
>At 01/01/03 13:02 -0500, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>>At 12:52 03/01/01, J. William Semich wrote:
>>>Yes. Windows 2000 Professional - Multililanguage version.
>>
>> Many applications, including some widely used MUAs,
>>on Win2k Multilingual do NOT handle UTF8 correctly. If this
>>is the best you can come up with, you aren't being persuasive.
>>
>>Ran
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Dan
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Randy Bush
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8... Martin J. Duerst
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? Brian W. Spolarich
- [idn] What's wrong with IDNE? (was Re:... J. William Semich
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with IDNE?... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] What's wrong with skwan-utf8? J. William Semich
