At 07:52 AM 9/1/00 +0800, James Seng wrote: >A twist in the same argument but would make good sense too :-) > >Care to doc this down in an I-D? We need a transition doc. Frankly, I am hoping that someone will first solve item 6, like making quoted-printable have a usable "pretty" format. I believe the benefit, in this case, would be enormous. >Dave Crocker wrote: > > > > 6. It would be wonderful to have ACE produce an ASCII encoding that is > > tolerable to human, but that probably requires wasting too many characters > > in a domain field to be acceptable. (To re-invoke the MIME model, the > > difference in similar to the intention behind quoted-printable, versus > > bin64; unfortunately, quoted-printable has proved ineffective.)
- [idn] IDNRA comments Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- RE: [idn] IDNRA comments Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments A. Vine
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
