there is a twist in the twist as well. I could see providing an alternate "raw" interface to DNS for queries for non-ascii-encoded IDNs. but even if that is done and resolver software is upgraded to use it, the ascii-encoded versions of IDNs will still need to be used in other contexts, such as email headers. so it's not clear what is to be gained by having a raw query interface, other than the possibility of slightly different results depending on which interface is used, due to implementation differences (presumably bugs). it sounds nice to provide a raw interface, but I'm not sure it's a win. Keith
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- RE: [idn] IDNRA comments Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments A. Vine
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Maynard Kang
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments James Seng
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Dan
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Marco d'Itri
- Re: [idn] IDNRA comments Keith Moore
