The following SC/TC equivalence comtains a mistake:
IDNA? [nameprep]? ACE
GB > Unicode SC
Big5>Unicode > SC Unicode Latin Case folding ACE encoding
Mixed Unicode > SC Unicode
and it should be:
IDNA? [nameprep]? ACE
GB > SC Unicode
Big5>SC Unicode Latin Case folding ACE encoding
Mixed Unicode > SC Unicode
So, the proposal is:
[nameprep] ACE
GB > SC Unicode
Big5>SC Unicode ACE encoding
Mixed Unicode > SC Unicode
Latin Case folding
JIS > SC Unicode
KSC > TC Unicode
ISCII > Indic Unicode
There are limited number of standards which is referenced
by Unicode standard, where we can allow limited number of
them to make into [nameprep].
Liana
- Re: [idn] opt... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn... Soobok Lee
- RE: [idn] opt... Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [idn] opt... Edmon
- Re: [idn... ben
- Re: [idn] opt... David Hopwood
- Re: [idn... ben
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn... David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] opt... Edmon
- Re: [idn] opt... liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn... David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] opt... ben
- Re: [idn] opt... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn] opt... tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw
- Re: [idn... Edmon
- Re: [idn... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [idn... James Seng/Personal
- Re: [idn... Edmon
- Re: [idn] opt... ben
- Re: [idn... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
