> Hopefully, the WG chairs will agree with this and put it on the WG > web site at <http://www.i-d-n.net/>. And hopefully they will update > that page so that it reflects the current draft of AMC-Z. Can't speak for Marc but I do know Marc have been trying to get this action done but this is a case without precedent for IANA. We are still waiting for answer from IANA on this. But for testing implemention (not deployment), feel free to use Paul's suggestion. ps: Personally, I do not see why a prefix need to be set for testing AMC-Z implementation since you only need to compare the encoded ACE without the prefix. -James Seng
- [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementations Paul Hoffman / IMC
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... James Seng/Personal
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... Shaw, Robert
- Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... DougEwell2
- Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... Mark Davis
- Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementa... John C Klensin
- Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... DougEwell2
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... Shaw, Robert
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementa... John C Klensin
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... Shaw, Robert
- RE: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementa... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Prefix for testing AMC-Z implementation... Adam M. Costello
